Measuring the Right Outcomes of Transformation

Transformation isn’t solely about reducing costs or increasing efficiency. While many organizations pursue change with these goals in mind, the real value—and real risk—goes far deeper. A narrow focus on margin improvement often overlooks a wide range of positive and negative impacts that shape the overall return on investment (ROI).

This insight explores how leaders can more fully account for all outcomes of transformation: the first-tier financial benefits, second-tier performance and customer outcomes, and third-tier cultural and risk implications. Each tier may influence another, so considering them together is extremely important. It also underscores the importance of evaluating potential pitfalls early through scenario planning, business case development, and strategic decision frameworks that support smarter prioritization and funding of change initiatives.

Looking Beyond Tier One Outcomes: A Broader Definition of ROI

The most visible outcomes of transformation efforts typically fall into what we call first-tier benefits—cost reduction, revenue growth, productivity gains and margin improvements. These are traditionally quantifiable, favored by finance leaders and often the primary justification for change.

Second-tier benefits can be just as impactful, even if they’re harder to measure:

• Improved employee morale, as repetitive tasks are eliminated and staff can focus on higher-value, purpose-driven work.
• Customer satisfaction gains, driven by more consistent service delivery, reduced wait times, and fewer errors.
• Operational risk reduction, through tighter controls, better data governance, and more transparent decision-making.

Then there are third-tier benefits, which often emerge over time:

• Organizational agility—the ability to pivot quickly in response to external pressures.
• A healthier, more adaptive culture, shaped by holistic design and empowered teams.
• Enhanced brand and market perception, particularly when transformation aligns with ethical, sustainable, or customer and community centric goals.

Together, these layers of benefit expand the value proposition behind standard success criteria for transformation. According to a 2023 McKinsey study, organizations that incorporated non-financial metrics into their transformation planning were 1.5 times more likely to report sustained performance improvements two years post-implementation.*

This expanded definition of ROI is especially critical when organizations must choose between competing transformation initiatives. Understanding the full breadth of outcomes allows leaders to make more informed funding and prioritization decisions—not only based on direct payback, but also on the ripple effects across workforce, compliance, and brand.

For transformations driven by regulatory or compliance imperatives, an expanded ROI lens is just as vital. In these cases, return may be measured in reduced exposure, increased stakeholder trust, or maintained licensure. When planned holistically, even compliance-led transformations can deliver broader business benefits—streamlining outdated processes, boosting transparency, and reinforcing a company’s reputation for integrity.

Hidden Costs and Unintended Consequences

While the upside can be expansive, transformation also carries risks—especially when executed in silos or rushed. These ROI-reducing factors often go unnoticed until it’s too late:

• Customer dissatisfaction, when cost-cutting sacrifices personalized experiences.
• Morale decline, stemming from poor communication, insufficient change management, or perceived loss of job security.
• Process fragility, where redesigned workflows introduce new bottlenecks or failure points.
• Regulatory or compliance gaps, particularly when systems and controls don’t evolve alongside structural change.

Even small oversights in these areas can lead to cascading operational issues. Research by BCG found that more than 70% of transformation failures can be traced back to inadequate change planning and people-related risks.*

The Power of Holistic Planning: Scenario Development and Business Case Rigor

Understanding these impacts—both positive and negative—should begin in the earliest stages of transformation. Scenario planning and rigorous business case development enable organizations to:

• Model multiple outcomes, based on varying assumptions about adoption rates, external conditions, or internal capability.
• Surface competing priorities, such as balancing cost reduction with service quality or employee retention.
• Stress-test strategic decisions, revealing how changes may affect different stakeholder groups or business units.
• Prioritize initiatives not just on direct ROI, but on contribution to long-term strategic value, risk posture, and regulatory readiness.

By integrating a broader set of variables into planning, leaders can make more robust, informed decisions—avoiding the trap of overly linear ROI projections.

How NewStage Partners Can Help

At NewStage Partners, we help clients design transformation strategies that account for the full spectrum of outcomes—financial, operational, cultural, customer-centric, and regulatory. Our integrated approach includes:

• Holistic scenario planning across business units and stakeholder groups.
• Business case development that weighs first-, second-, and third-tier impacts.
• Execution frameworks that incorporate risk mitigation, workforce alignment, and clear performance metrics.
• Strategic prioritization tools that align transformation investments with enterprise goals and external pressures.

Transformation is never isolated to processes—it’s about positioning your organization for enduring, multi-dimensional value. We bring the experience and tools to help you get there.

Let’s talk about how your transformation can drive more than just efficiency. Let’s make sure it drives value—at every tier.

Sources:

1. McKinsey & Company, “The State of Transformation,” 2023; BCG, “Why MostTransformations Fail,” 2022.

‍